I had posted a discount for two #2544A Blocks a while ago. This was a mistake, the discounts were supposed to be for two #2538 sheets. I am not sure whether it was my error, or a hip stamp error, but

My recommendation was based more on experience of watching the dealers I bought from operate at the end of shows (I seldom had that kind of cash). They would buy out the entire stock of dealers who ti

30788331^Upper Senegal & Niger #25 Used CDS SOTN CV$1.40 Camel Rider^171^Upper Senegal & Niger^25^general-issue^used^single^animals-mammals^1^1^1.05^0.52^hs19-2019-08-25-0681^https://storage.g

For your example, Scott does not differentiate other than for color, with two colors listed for #25 and four colors listed for #26. #26 also has tete beche pair listed.

If someone has copies of both the standard and the specialized, a simple test would suffice. Scott #25 and #26, the Napolean III perf 14 x 13½, each have one primary listing, and one add'l listing fo

These are #251 pairs, can anyone tell me about the cancellations?

At the bottom of the listing for each catalog number is the earliest documented use. For #248 it is October 16, 1894. For #250 it is October 11, 1894; #250a (rose color) it is October 13, 1894.

Can anyone tell me what the earliest date is

1995 Hard Cover, #2587, 2876, 2948, 2950-2958, 2961-2968, 2973a,  2974-2992, 2997a, 2999-3007, 3019-3023

member #251--

"Great Britain #258 1/2P King George 6, used EGRADED VF". This is an example of what I mean by USELESS! "EGRADED" is totally pointless. This stamp has a TRUE value of just 15c but

My last sale US. #2540 used block is still listed on bidstart but not on Hipstamp m