|
Positive Feedback Automatically Left After 45 days
05/19/2024 20:02:04
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Positive Feedback Automatically Left After 45 days
05/19/2024 20:02:02
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Positive Feedback Automatically Left After 45 days
05/19/2024 19:45:04
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Positive Feedback Automatically Left After 45 days
05/19/2024 19:39:03
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Positive Feedback Automatically Left After 45 days
05/19/2024 19:25:06
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Positive Feedback Automatically Left After 45 days
04/21/2024 22:08:04
|
Seller: willydog (10814) |
|
Positive Feedback Automatically Left After 45 days
04/21/2024 19:56:02
|
Seller: Rosenberg-Philatelics (257422) |
|
Positive Feedback Automatically Left After 45 days
04/14/2024 19:59:03
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Positive Feedback Automatically Left After 45 days
03/31/2024 21:31:04
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Positive Feedback Automatically Left After 45 days
03/31/2024 21:27:03
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Thumbs up.
02/17/2024 11:24:03
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Thumbs up.
02/17/2024 11:24:03
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Thumbs up.
02/17/2024 11:24:03
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Thumbs up.
02/17/2024 11:24:03
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Thumbs up.
02/17/2024 11:23:20
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Thumbs up.
02/10/2024 16:06:12
|
Seller: StuartKatzStamps (12870) |
|
Just received today. It is in wonderful condition and just what was advertised.
02/05/2024 17:17:18
|
Seller: pkfreedom (5387) |
|
The stamp was very nice and matched what Momen was advertising. Thanks
02/05/2024 17:15:51
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Momen Stamps is great!!!
02/01/2024 23:09:34
|
Seller: MalackStamps (42561) |
|
Nice stamp
02/01/2024 23:08:16
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Perfect stamp. Love it.
01/23/2024 23:15:18
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Scott #343 stamp was incorrectly identified. The water mark isn't a double line watermark that is required for this stamp.
01/15/2024 18:26:43
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Scott #343 stamp was incorrectly identified. The water mark isn't a double line watermark that is required for this stamp.
01/15/2024 18:26:43
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Scott #343 stamp was incorrectly identified. The water mark isn't a double line watermark that is required for this stamp.
01/15/2024 18:26:43
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Scott #343 stamp was incorrectly identified. The water mark isn't a double line watermark that is required for this stamp.
01/15/2024 18:26:43
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Scott #343 stamp was incorrectly identified. The water mark isn't a double line watermark that is required for this stamp.
01/15/2024 18:26:43
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Scott #343 stamp was incorrectly identified. The water mark isn't a double line watermark that is required for this stamp.
01/15/2024 18:26:43
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Scott #343 stamp was incorrectly identified. The water mark isn't a double line watermark that is required for this stamp.
01/15/2024 18:26:43
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Scott #343 stamp was incorrectly identified. The water mark isn't a double line watermark that is required for this stamp.
01/15/2024 18:26:43
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
The 408 has an obvious hinge mark and it is not as described.
01/15/2024 15:21:04
|
Seller: Rosenberg-Philatelics (257422) |
|
The 285 appears to be regummed in my opinion and not MNH OG as claimed.
01/15/2024 15:18:35
|
Seller: Rosenberg-Philatelics (257422) |
|
Thank you. There were some nice stamps in this lot.
01/15/2024 15:08:19
|
Seller: Rosenberg-Philatelics (257422) |
|
One stamp looked fine. However the 504 stamp looks like it has been regummed to cover a previous hinge mark - in my opinion.
01/15/2024 00:53:35
|
Seller: MalackStamps (42561) |
|
One stamp looked fine. However the 504 stamp looks like it has been regummed to cover a previous hinge mark - in my opinion.
01/15/2024 00:53:35
|
Seller: MalackStamps (42561) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition, but one stamp had disturbed gum, which shouldn't have been sent because it was listed a VF with a score of 95.
01/09/2024 20:28:51
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition, but one stamp had disturbed gum, which shouldn't have been sent because it was listed a VF with a score of 95.
01/09/2024 20:28:51
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition, but one stamp had disturbed gum, which shouldn't have been sent because it was listed a VF with a score of 95.
01/09/2024 20:28:51
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition, but one stamp had disturbed gum, which shouldn't have been sent because it was listed a VF with a score of 95.
01/09/2024 20:28:51
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition, but one stamp had disturbed gum, which shouldn't have been sent because it was listed a VF with a score of 95.
01/09/2024 20:28:51
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition, but one stamp had disturbed gum, which shouldn't have been sent because it was listed a VF with a score of 95.
01/09/2024 20:28:51
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Thumbs up.
12/29/2023 15:58:02
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Thumbs up.
12/29/2023 15:58:02
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Thumbs up.
12/29/2023 15:58:02
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Thumbs up.
12/29/2023 15:58:02
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition. However, the commemorative sheet #630 had a tear and the #298 (in my opinion) had been obviously regummed. Stamps were listed with a numerical grade of 95, but certificates were not provided.
12/29/2023 15:55:50
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition. However, the commemorative sheet #630 had a tear and the #298 (in my opinion) had been obviously regummed. Stamps were listed with a numerical grade of 95, but certificates were not provided.
12/29/2023 15:55:50
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition. However, the commemorative sheet #630 had a tear and the #298 (in my opinion) had been obviously regummed. Stamps were listed with a numerical grade of 95, but certificates were not provided.
12/29/2023 15:55:50
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition. However, the commemorative sheet #630 had a tear and the #298 (in my opinion) had been obviously regummed. Stamps were listed with a numerical grade of 95, but certificates were not provided.
12/29/2023 15:55:50
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition. However, the commemorative sheet #630 had a tear and the #298 (in my opinion) had been obviously regummed. Stamps were listed with a numerical grade of 95, but certificates were not provided.
12/29/2023 15:55:50
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
Most of the stamps were in fine condition. However, the commemorative sheet #630 had a tear and the #298 (in my opinion) had been obviously regummed. Stamps were listed with a numerical grade of 95, but certificates were not provided.
12/29/2023 15:55:50
|
Seller: momenstamps (96263) |
|
|
